Local recurrence and subsequent endoscopic treatment after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection with or without precutting in the colorectum

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases. METHODS: The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded. RESULTS: Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95–32.30; P<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection. CONCLUSIONS: The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases.

To be or not to be: disección endoscópica submucosa o resección endoscópica de la mucosa en el tratamiento de las neoplasias gastrointestinales / To be or not to be: endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasia

Endoscopic treatment of early gastrointestinal neoplasias has become the standard treatment in Japan and other Asia-Pacific countries, while it is still a developing technology in the West. The advent of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection in the last decade has allowed early treatment of malignancies in a manner that preserves the organ, avoiding major surgery with less morbidity and mortality, and overall survival rates compared to standard surgery. In Japan and other Asia-Pacific countries, submucosal dissection has shifted over endoscopic mucosal resection as the technique of choice in the recent years, because of the possibility of treating deeper and larger lesions, with higher rates of bloc and curative resections, and lower recurrence rates, but with a higher rate of complications and a longer learning curve.

El tratamiento endoscópico de las neoplasias gastrointestinales precoces se ha convertido en el estándar de tratamiento en Japón y otros países del Asia-Pacífico, siendo aún una técnica en desarrollo en occidente. La aparición de la resección endoscópica de la mucosa y la disección endoscópica submucosa en la última década, ha permitido tratar las neoplasias precoces, logrando preservar el órgano, y evitando así una cirugía mayor, con menor morbi-mortalidad y cifras de sobrevida comparables con el tratamiento quirúrgico convencional. En Japón y otros países del Asia-Pacífico, la disección sub-mucosa ha desplazado en los últimos años a la resección endoscópica de la mucosa como técnica de elección, debido a la posibilidad de resecar lesiones más profundas y de mayor tamaño, con mayor tasa de resección en bloque y curativa, y menor recidiva. Sin embargo, con una mayor tasa de complicaciones y una curva de aprendizaje más larga.